Category Archives: Pop Culture

Una LaMarche: Project Runway Episode 6 Recap: Bridesmaid Revisited

Sorry I’m late this week, guys! I was at a four-day wedding extravaganza that involved a choreographed flash mob musical number. Really. Plus I was writing an article for my day job on Christian Siriano. So I was kind of thinking about Project Runway. And the good news is, no more weddings for the rest of the year, so recaps should be up Mondays for the remainder of the season. I’ll still be doing choreographed flash mob musical numbers, obviously, any chance I get.

Anyway, previously on: SHIT. WENT. DOWN. Team Superego/Grammy Hall and Team Desperately Seeking Sergeant Susan faced off in a runway battle more fierce than Zoolander and Hansel‘s underpants-removing walk-off. When the scrappy Bad News Bears came out on top (with Casanova finally scoring a win), the A-Team basically imploded. Everyone crapped all over Michael C. and Gretchen went rogue, turning on her entire team. AJ went home for making an ugly shirtdress. It looked like it was all over… but then Timmy Gumms came backstage and put the smackdown on Gretchen! It was epic! Shakespeare and M. Night Shyamalan combined* could not have crafted a better tragedy with a shocking twist ending.

*Note to genetic scientists: Do not do this.

We open on Lady Liberty, quietly shepherding the wretched refuse of her teeming shores toward the Atlas apartments. Michael Drummond, wearing–what else?–a kerchief, wakes up like one of those flower Munchkins from The Wizard of Oz, only slightly less cheerful. “Oh, good morning!” he cries, throwing open the curtain. “It’s like being trapped in hell.” Welcome to this episode, friends. Brought to you by HP, Piperlime, and Satan.

Everyone is still reeling from last week’s drama. “That was one mighty ugly runway,” Peach s(ch)nap(p)s. “If Michael Costello wasn’t safe he would have gone home,” April says. “And he deserves to because he can’t fucking sew.” Ivy and Val agree that Michael C. will be the next to go. Poor Michael C. Sure, he’s kind of a big baby and his clothes can be lackluster, but the other designers seem unnecessarily cruel. As reader John wrote to me in an email:

What on earth did Michael C. ever do to make them all hate him so much? When he came backstage and announced he had won, everyone just sat there with faces like they were sucking on a sour pickle. Maybe it was done by editing, but what a bunch of jerks. I would give anything for Michael C. to be the final winner, just to piss those nasty assholes off.

HA.

Gretchen is still deeply wounded that Tim said she was manipulative, but in a moment of delicious schadenfreude, Ivy and Val whisper that the Gunn fire was good for Gretchen, and that it might bring her back to reality (meaning, I think, real reality, not the reality of reality television, in which–as we all know–mouthy bitches tend to dominate).

In other news, guess whose favorite prop gets carted onto the runway, AGAIN?

2010-09-08-Heidibag.JPG
Nothing excites me like seeing Heidi Klum half in the bag.

Heidi tells the gang that they have new models and quite a task ahead of them, and sure enough out come 11 women in hideous satin gowns. “I’m shitting my pants right now,” Andy overshares.

2010-09-08-pr8ep62.jpg

The women are, of course, wearing former bridesmaids dresses. “All were told ‘You can totally wear this again!'” laughs Heidi. The designers must each choose a model and gown and create a new look that sucks less than the original.

“I don’t know why every bride wants her bridesmaids to look so bad, but they do,” Christopher interviews. Ha, it’s so true. I made mine wear fat suits and cornrows.

The maids of dishonor introduce themselves. Most just say their name, but a sassy one named Kim adds, “I don’t know if you notice, but I have a huge vertical bow on my chest.” This joke kills, so the next woman, Lena, also decides to go for it. “I think my dress might have been inspired by a giant Jolly Rancher,” she says. The polite laughter that follows is painful.

Since he won last week and has immunity, Casanova has dibs. He picks a woman named Julia wearing a not-entirely-vomitous blue gown, but interviews that he didn’t even pick her based on the dress; he picked her because she’s “striking” and skinny, aka the modeliest.

The velvet bag delivers its magical judgment: April’s name gets picked first, and she chooses a silver pleated gown that’s kind of kicky and retro. Peach loves green, so she selects a dress the color of day-old bile. Ivy goes with a white gown with a bateau neck, and… can we just stop for a second and talk about what kind of horrifying sociopath that bride must have been to dress her bridesmaids in floor-length white gowns? With bateau necks?!? Michael Costello (who, it should be noted, is the first designer to request a model by name), picks Brooke, in a black and white number. Andy scores feisty Kim with the giant vertical chest bow, and Christopher picks someone named Nana, which is a good enough reason for me. Mondo chooses Amanda, who is wearing a girly pink strapless gown with some kind of floral embroidered border on the bust. It looks salvageable… until she turns around to reveal a white, skunky stripe running down the back! Girl looks like Dance Magic Barbie after being run over by a paint striping machine, and Mondo is not amused.

2010-09-08-Mondosurprise.JPG

Gretchen picks a model named Latifah in very busy burgundy concotion and Valerie chooses Lena the Jolly Rancher, leaving Michael Drummond with the last dress standing, a Pepto Bismol pink number worn by a curvy woman named Jacqueline. Her dress is not the worst of the bunch (that honor, I think we can agree, goes to Dance Magic Amanda), so it’s pretty clear she didn’t get picked first because she’s plus-sized. First, that’s sad. And second, as The Jersey Shore‘s Angelina would say, um, hello!! The bigger gal, the bigger the yardage you get to work with. I would have thought that was a plus.

The designers arrive at Parsons to find their bridesmaids’ gowns waiting for them on dress forms like headless, tasteless party guests. Tim comes in to tell them that they have some time to sketch and consult with their models and then have $50 at Mood to buy up to two yards of additional fabric. But mostly, he comes to tell Christopher that Nana has gotten cold feet and pulled out of the challenge (sing it with me now: Nana, Nana! Nana, Nana! Hey-ey-ey. Gooooodbye!). So Christopher gets a new model… and a new dress.

2010-09-09-Chrisnewdress.JPG
To paraphrase what Saved By the Bell taught us during that Very Special Episode, there’s no hope with taupe.

Christopher, obviously, is fucked. Tim’s face says it all.

Quick cuts: Mondo wants to make one-sleeved cocktail dress. April’s model is super picky. Michael Drummond interviews that, when you’re designing for a woman who’s a little more “volumshuous,” it can go really wrong. (It can also go very wrong when your designer is a man in a kerchief who can’t pronounce a ‘pt’ sound.) You know, Michael Drummond is getting an awful lot of screen time, y’all. Plus he has a tiny Virgin Mary at his work table. This does not bode well, because this either means he needs divine intervention or is smuggling heroin out of Nigeria like on Lost. And then, at Mood, he decides to buy UPHOLSTERY FABRIC. For a PLUS-SIZED MODEL. LIKE SHE IS A COUCH. No way that can backfire, Aunt Jemima.

Back in the work room, Peach sighs, “Oh, Mondo help me with my butt.” Michael C’s dress is looking good, and Val announces to the sewing circle that she is pissed that MC probably won’t go home and that the judges can’t see his shortcomings. Meanwhile, Gretchen Skypes with her mom while wearing a fedora. If this is an attempt to get me to like her more, it’s not working.

Tim comes back to check in. Things are a little tense between him and Gretchen, but Gretchen interviews that she needs Tim to critique her work, not to be an emotional mentor. Gretchen has made some kind of ombre shirt that looks like it recently caught fire but has since been put out. Tim loves it but thinks it may be looking too athletic.

Michael C. is hard at work on a black cocktail dress, but Tim is taken aback. “Your model asked for lace with a puff sleeve?” he says. “Talk her out of it!” The other Michael, meanwhile, is busy upholstering his volumshuous dress form. The thing is, he’s only upholstering the boobies. Tim thinks it looks like a “great big oversize bra.” Casanova, in a rare moment of astute commentary, observes that Michael D. basically just put a lace overlay on the dress and cut it short but didn’t transform it.

Mondo is doing a Mod-style 60s pink and black cocktail dress that Tim adores. Peach, on the other hand, is working with some truly heinous fabric; it’s like if Neopolitan ice cream was made of paisley, flowers and BrickBreaker. Christopher has already made his unfortunate second dress look ten times better, but Tim warns him to watch the proportions. Ivy’s client wants to show so much skin that Tim quips, “Make her a thong and call it a day.” On the flip side, needing more sex appeal is Valerie, who is working on what looks like a very fetching tennis outfit. “This is looking about as far away from fashion as you can possibly get,” Tim warns. “This is looking more like… clothes.” Ouch.

Done with the critiques, Tim announces that he has a surprise. Tomorrow will not be a runway day, but rather a fashion expo in which all of the models stand around while regular folks that Lifetime lures in off the street throw buttons in fishbowls to vote for their favorites. YES.

The next morning at Atlas, Valerie is feeling insecure, but Gretchen and Ivy make her feel better by hating on Peach instead. Peach admits to April that she thinks she’ll be in the bottom but isn’t sure her dress is the worst.

At the public showcase, the bridesmaids find that wearing their hideous wedding castoffs on national TV is not, in fact, the most demeaning thing they’ve signed up for:

2010-09-09-Fishbowl.JPG

Tim encourages the designers to interact with the crowds (“really seduce them”) and actively try to win buttons. It’s like some kind of elementary school counting game crossed with a slave auction, and it’s riveting. Mondo and Michael C. do very well, while Peach and Michael D. can barely rustle up a pity vote. Meanwhile, Ivy hears that Michael C. has been trying to sabotage her, telling everyone she’s “the bitch of the show.” And while I certainly wouldn’t put it past Michael C. to do something vindictive and bitchy like that, if the cameras had caught it don’t you think they’d show us? Later, at Atlas, Andy asks Michael if the rumor is true and Michael denies it. “I would never do that,” he interviews, “Because I know how hard we all work.” Hmmm… liar?

Anyway, let’s leave that be for a second, because we need to talk about this:

2010-09-09-kERCHIEFS.jpg
When did this show become The Sisterhood of the Traveling Do-Rags? And when did Andy surpass April in the Pebbles Flintstone lookalike contest?

Anyway, on the day of the real show, Peach is still struggling to finish a skirt that doesn’t fit right due to a cutting error and Michael D. is still telling himself and whoever else who will listen that his giant couch bra is actually really cute. Michael C. tells Ivy in the sewing room that he didn’t try to affect the outcome the Great Button Caper, but she doesn’t believe him and neither does anyone else. Good times!

Out on the runway, Heidi introduces the judges: MK, Nina, and Cynthia Rowley, who is wearing ankle socks with open-toed shoes. (It’s just a hop, skip, and a few beers to Tevas and sweat socks, people. We must be vigilant!)

__________________

ANDY

2010-09-09-Andyrunway.JPG

So many things. The top–fine. I’ll accept it. It looks like Spanx, or an Herve Leger knockoff, but fine. The bottoms, however, A) don’t go with the top; B) HAVE CHAINS GOING INTO HER LABIA*; and C) are part of a troubling and relatively recent trend of “formal shorts,” which I do not accept.

*Name ONE WOMAN (other than Paris Hilton) who keeps her wallet in her vagina.

APRIL

2010-09-09-Aprilrunway.JPG

I really like this–it manages to be casual and dressy, interesting but not over-the-top, and just really pretty. The silver accent is my favorite part.

CASANOVA

2010-09-09-Casanovarunway.JPG

I can get behind the concept for this look–the shape of the top complements the tightness of the pants and the boots go really well; I like the styling. But there is too much shiny fabric going on, no? I wish the top had been matte or gauzy or something to make this outfit look less cheap. And, for the record (I will also go on the record below–ahem, Ivy), shiny sausage-casing capri pants are not even the boniest girl’s best friend.

CHRISTOPHER

2010-09-09-Chrisrunway.JPG

Shockingly even to me, this was my favorite dress on the runway. When I first saw the original dress, I actually recoiled, so it is a testament to Christopher that I would almost consider wearing this. I really love the draping on top, and the way the bodice underneath pops out (I KNOW. I am praising an errant beige peek-a-boob. Maybe there IS hope with taupe after all…)

GRETCHEN

2010-09-09-Gretchenrunway.JPG

I don’t know, guys, this just looks dirty and burned to me, kind of like Sigourney Weaver near the end of Ghostbusters: “There is no Latifah, only Zuul!”

Also, Gretchen: Those boots don’t go with everything.

IVY

2010-09-09-Ivyrunway.JPG

I am personally of the opinion that shiny white capri pants are no one’s friend. No disrespect to this model, but she proves my point: Even a slender woman is done no favors by these, especially in the hip and thigh area. I will say that I can easily picture this model sipping cocktails on a yacht, so the look as a whole works, even if the parts (hello, high-necked, see-through orange blouse!) are questionable.

MICHAEL C.

2010-09-09-MCrunway.JPG

I don’t know about this. There is a lot going on, what with the lace and the satin and the velvet and the frou-frou draping. I feel like you find a dress like this–likely last worn to a 1987 prom–in every vintage shop. It’s not ugly, but it’s certainly not modern.

MICHAEL D.

2010-09-09-MDrunway.JPG

I’m going to go on record as saying that I don’t actually think (minor spoiler alert) that this dress is worse than the original, as the judges said. I think it’s just equally bad. The full skirt and jacket are a terrible combination, since the skirt widens her hips and the jacket cuts her off and hides her waist. Even her hairdo makes her look rounder than she is. And I won’t even get into the cheap overlay. All I will say is that much as you don’t go around carrying change in your vag, you don’t upholster a human being. It just isn’t done.

MONDO

2010-09-09-Mondorunway.JPG

This is cute and quirky and makes me crave Neopolitan ice cream of the non-Peach variety. I’d love to see the model with a slicked-back bun, though, because I think this has the potential to be much more chic than a high ponytail allows. This also reminds me that I need to catch up on my GTL.

PEACH

2010-09-09-Peachrunway.JPG

Oof. I mean, damn. That is just ugly. It’s like Anne of Green Gables went blind and stumbled into a Mandee’s during a fire sale. And those green saddlebags… I can’t even. Wait, yes I can: Anne of Green Saddlebags! Full circle!

VALERIE

2010-09-09-Valrunway.JPG

I feel like this is what Minnie Mouse would wear to waitress at a beer garden. I can’t believe Valerie made this–it’s such a departure from her other work in terms of quality. The straps are like a suspension bridge spanning from breast to breast and the front bow looks sloppy and amateur. But the most confusing aspect are the two black panels that are not quite on the sides and not quite on the front. They look like those bars slapped over the eyes of people wearing acid-washed thong bikinis in Glamour‘s Dos & Don’ts section. So I guess her side boobs and ribcage declined to participate in this charade.

__________________

After the show, Heidi calls the following people forward: April, Andy, Gretchen, Ivy, Casanova. They are safe, and return to the green room to place bets on who’s a top and who’s a bottom.

The remaining six defend their looks. The judges love:

CHRISTOPHER, who made the long, brown, embroidered monstrosity he was saddled with into a short, sexy outfit. Cynthia Rowley is excited because it looks “like you took a bridesmaid’s dress, ripped it up, put it back together and repurposed it.” Yup, pretty much. Has someone not been paying attention to the obvious expository narrative that follows each commercial break?

MONDO, who not only won the button election but who also turned a frothy pink gown into a cute, edgy look with interesting lines and feminine details.

MICHAEL C., whose short black cocktail dress wins raves for its proportion and tailoring.

The judges give their collective stinkeye to:

PEACH, who took an ugly green polyester dress and turned it into… that. MK does a nice little psych-out: “I think her hair looks gorgeous.” [pause] “But that’s the only thing I think is gorgeous.” He calls out the “avocado dinner napkins*” on the hips and the “bedskirt ruffle” in the back. Heidi says it’s just not good. Nina is bored. C-Ro thinks fashion should be effortless but that Peach’s dress looks uptight. “I got lost,” Peach admits.

*He later amends this to “avocado goiter,” but I think he’s reaching. THIS was a goiter.

MICHAEL D., who wanted to make a fun, flirty cocktail dress but ended up with curtains and cleavage. MK thought the other, brighter color looked better on the model, and Heidi says the whole dress looked better before the transformation.

VALERIE, whose color-blocking efforts went horribly awry. “It’s like you turned her into some nursing grandmother chest!” MK says–and no, he does not mean nursing home, he means nursing bra. Because apparenty all the grannies out there are lactating.

The judges deliberate. They love the irony of Michael C.’s victory on the heels of Team Awesome throwing him under the bus. MK calls Mondo’s model’s hair and makeup “Snooki and the Flintstones.”

Backstage, everyone is silently seething that Michael C. got high marks. As soon as the top and bottom six leave again, Gretchen bursts out with “What show are we fucking on? I mean, I feel like I shouldn’t even be here, man.”

So, it’s very late and my brain is functioning solely on a bag of Reese’s Pieces that my husband forced me to eat to keep from passing out, but I want to take a second to examine the Curious Case of Michael C. Clearly, everyone hates him. I think this is at least partially because he comes off as kind of obnoxious, insincere, and smarmy, but they’ve also been very vocal about the fact that his talent level is not up to par. From a viewer’s perspective, I think Michael has been inconsistent, but no more so than some of the others. I mean, Valerie has shown herself to be a fantastic seamstress in weeks past, but this dress was a hot mess. It didn’t even look like–to borrow a favorite phrase of Gretchen’s–“student work.” It looked like a homemade Halloween costume. So. To echo John’s earlier point, what is the cast seeing that we’re not? Is it possible that Michael’s skill level really is that low and that he just gets lucky occasionally? Or are they a bunch of bullies?

Anyway, guess what? Michael C. wins the challenge. And when he tells the designers backstage, they look at him like he just took a shit in their Cheerios.

2010-09-09-MCwinsfaces.JPG
Species: Assholus majorus.

“Of course you did,” Ivy snaps unkindly. I guess I can give her a pass, since she and MC have button beef, but then again a friend of mine told me this weekend that he used to work with Ivy and that she is indeed a nasty bitch.

Gretchen interviews that she feels that craftsmanship isn’t as rewarded as she had hoped (could this have something to do with her not having won a challenge for three weeks?)

To his credit, Casanova is gracious, saying that he respects Michael C. and thinks he is very humble. (Okay, let’s maybe not go that far.)

Out on the runway, Mondo and Christopher are in, followed by Val, thank goodness. Which leaves Michael D. and Peach, who have knowing smiles on their faces–I think they both realized from early on in the challenge that they were screwed.

Heidi tells Peach that she made her model’s bridesmaid’s dress worse, and that the green ruffles added insult to injury. With Michael she is even more blunt: he made an ugly dress uglier.

But Michael D. and his kerchief are in. Which means that Peach is out.

“Thank you,” she tells the judges. “I’ve had the time of my life.” She then performs the entire routine from Dirty Dancing‘s climactic scene (in loafers, no less), leaping off of the runway only to have Michael Kors catch her in a perfect lift!!!! And Heidi just stands there smiling blankly like the slutty sister who let Robbie the waiter get to second base.

OK, no. But in my dreams.

As she says her very sweet goodbyes to her fellow designers, it is revealed that Peach is known among the cast as “the fairy drag-mother.” (Um, editors, why is this the first time we are hearing of this?) I really will miss Peach. She grew on me, even if her clothes did not. Reader PD wrote me to say that s/he thought Peach gout aufed because of her “failure to offer one even remotely snarky comment in six weeks.” That may be, but Peach had a great sense of humor, something far more valuable (in my opinion) than pretentious snark from people who otherwise exhibit the personality of a piece of cardboard (Andy, Christopher–I am looking at you.)

Next week: Michael Kors sends the gang out on a boat to get inspired for a resort wear challenge but, sadly, no one falls overboard. In a twist that’s not fully revealed, designers have to work in pairs, and Mondo gets angry enough that he confronts Michael C. At judging, there is yet more talk of throwing someone under a bus. Again, sadly not literal. Wow, I’m violent today!

As always, if you like these recaps, check out my blog or become a fan on Facebook. And look for some dispatches from New York Fashion Week here on HuffPo starting Friday!

Read more: Reality TV, Project Runway, Style, Entertainment, Heidi Klum, Tim Gunn, Project Runway Lifetime, Comedy, Michael Kors, Style News

Madonna’s Daughter Lourdes Starts LaGuardia High School

Madonna’s daughter was the talk of the freshman class when she arrived for her first day of high school on Wednesday.

Surrounded by friends, Lourdes, who is enrolled as a public school student at the prestigious LaGuardia High School of Music & Art and Performing Arts in Manhattan, fit right into the mix, though she still had to contend with the ever-growing number of paparazzi outside.

Read more: Madonna, Lourdes High School, Celebrity Kids, Lourdes LaGuardia High School, Lourdes Leon, Entertainment News

Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie Buy $40 Million Home In Valpolicella, Italy?

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have a new place to kick back — a $40 million mansion in the hills of Valpolicella in northern Italy. It’s the couple’s third home, joining their LA pad and a $3.5 million New Orleans house.

Read more: Angelina Jolie, Italy, Valpolicella, Brad Pitt, Celebrity Real Estate, Entertainment News

Diane Dimond: The Media Lies to You — Beware!

I took some time off my regular schedule to write a book. It’s all about how we as a society have abrogated our opinion-making and handed it over to whatever media we follow.

For some people these days it takes too much time and effort to engage in critical thinking. But what if the media is just playing follow the leader — parroting each other and not really checking out the facts? It happens all the time, and now more than ever we need to use our common sense to help lead us to the truth.

My new book is about the couple the media branded “The White House Gate Crashers,” Michaele and Tareq Salahi. The name of it is Cirque du Salahi — Be Careful Who You Trust, and I don’t mention it here as just a shameless plug for my own work. I mention it because Cirque — or circus — perfectly describes the information superhighway traveling into our homes every minute of every day. It has become a circus of truths, half-truthful exaggerations and downright lies. Many of us gobble it up without stopping to think what we’re digesting.

Let’s analyze the nickname the press gave the Salahis just hours after they appeared at President Obama’s first state dinner on Nov. 24, 2009: “The White House Gate Crashers.” But, whoa! Stop and think about that a minute.

Nobody “crashes” the gate at the White House, for goodness sakes! The place is ringed with armed guards and a massive security net. So why would the media say that — over and over before any real facts were known? Because it’s catchy and it fits into today’s terrorist watch mentality. Salahi — why it even sounds like a suspect Middle Eastern name!

The Salahis decided to open up to one person — me — and to tell their whole story. During my investigation I got to dissect all their e-mails with a White House representative who promised to try to get them in to the event. I discovered the Salahis honestly believed they were invited to the welcoming ceremony for the Prime Minister of India. I learned that once they arrived at the White House they presented their passports to not one — but two — Secret Service checkpoints and they were waved right in. Once inside the grand reception hall staff ushered them through the official receiving line and then into the lavish dinner tent set up on the South Lawn.

Now, what part of that sounds like a “gate crashing” to you? That’s right — none of it. Yet to this day most media continue to refer to the Salahis as “crashers” and remind the public that federal charges are still a possibility. Ridiculous.

The Salahis immediately cooperated with federal investigators who learned the details I’ve just outlined for you — and much more. Yet those investigators apparently didn’t pass the word on to the Congressional Homeland Security Committee. Even before the hearing members publicly vilified the Salahis. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee called them “the perpetrators.” Her colleague, Eleanor Holmes Norton declared, “Clearly they were outlaws before they crashed the White House.” So when the couple was subpoenaed to appear before the committee there is there any wonder why they exercised their constitutional right to remain silent? With the deck already stacked against them they had no choice but to take their lawyer’s advice and plead the fifth. Your lawyer would tell you to do the same.

It was a shameful kangaroo court proceeding conducted by the congressional panel that’s supposed to be concentrating on ways to keep the country safe in this post 9-11 atmosphere. Instead, the politicians were more interested in getting face time on TV while the story was still hot.

The Salahis are not like you and me. Months before the White House event they were cast as members on a “reality” TV show. An odd move, in my book, but being odd is not against the law in America. They owe money to multiple creditors, but how many other citizens have gotten caught up in this bad economy? Their worst luck was to become the target in this new era of lock-and-load journalism. The media decides who the focus is and relentlessly zero in.

The Salahis’ biggest transgression may have been that they blindly trusted too many people. Their own entertainment lawyer paved the way to the White House state dinner then dropped them like a bag of toxic waste after the scandal broke. They trusted federal investigators would help clear their name. They trusted that the justice system and the federal grand jury hearing their evidence would exonerate them. They trusted that the media would ultimately get the story straight. But here we are almost a year later, and the Salahis are still twisting in the wind.

Too many of today’s professional journalists, augmented by mostly inexperienced internet bloggers, are all too eager to jump on the story-du-jour for fear of being left behind. Too bad they don’t take the time to research facts before parroting what others have reported before them.

Be careful who you trust.

Diane can be reached through her web site www.DianeDimond.com Her new book can be pre-ordered at Amazon.com.

Read more: Reality TV, Obama's State Dinner, Diane Dimond, Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, The Media Lies to You, Tareq and Michaele Salahi, Diane Dimond's Weekly Column, Congresswoman Sheeila Jackson Lee, Cirque Du Salahi Be Careful Who You Trust, Congressional Homeland Security Committee, Politics News

Caroline Giegerich: Is Ping the MySpace Music Slayer?

2010-09-04-Ping.png

Since Apple’s Wednesday announcement of the social network for music, Ping, the service has been called a MySpace killer. At the core of the Apple fan boy or girl, is an ethos that Apple can and will continuously do it better than the next guy. This ethos has been built on the back of the company’s ability to blow away the smartphone marketplace with one swift punch to the balls called the iPhone. As I sit with my iPhone parked next to me and my MacBook Pro at my fingertips, I certainly classify as an Apple fan girl. In Ping’s case, the assumption that Apple always draws shotgun would be a mistake. In its current configuration, Ping is not and will not be a MySpace killer. Until some major problems are fixed, it will continue to live in the shadow cast by powerhouses like Pandora and MySpace.

If the principle challenge with the MySpace platform is hyper-personalization turning the site into the bedroom of an over-eager teenage girl, the problem with Ping is the insistence on an overly simple user interface. I may not need the many bells and whistles thrown at me on MySpace daily but I do need more features than Ping is offering.

2010-09-04-Ping2.png

Here are a few reasons why Ping won’t crush my MySpace usage anytime soon:

1) What Do I Care About Most?

2010-09-04-Ping3.png
Photo Credit: Micki Krimmel

It’s the Music Stupid.

Ping seems to think the answer to this question is the sharing of music. In actuality, I care most about the music itself. I sit writing this while listening to Arcade Fire’s new album on MySpace. Currently, this band doesn’t even exist on Ping. While I sit listening to The Suburbs in full, the band gets a “No Results” on Ping. Yes, yes. I know the service is still too new to accommodate the likes of indie rock but perhaps more should have been done to draw bands into the service before it was launched to the public. Mashable posted an interesting article on the challenges bands face in entering the Ping world vs. the ease at which bands enter their MySpace communities and post at will. The Ping user needs more of their favorite bands and the bands need an easier way to access the new platform.
2010-09-04-Ping4.png
Above the selection of bands, what I really want on a music page is…in short, music. I want to listen to full-length songs like I can on MySpace music. I can’t even find any music to listen to on Lady GaGa’s Ping page until I click over to the iTunes store. As we all know in the online world, and for those who don’t know, shortening the click-thru stream is necessary for lazy audiences everywhere to engage with your platform. Don’t make it more difficult for me to get to what I really want: the music. And once I’m finally there, I get a 30 second nugget rather than what I really want: the full song. Let’s see a side-by-side Ping to MySpace comparison:

Ping
2010-09-04-Ping5.png

MySpace
2010-09-04-Ping6.png

2) Follow?
2010-09-04-Ping10.png

Sir Steve Jobs attracted me to the platform with his promise that 160MM global iTunes users would be there waiting for me. I fire up the upgrade, click on the attractive Ping logo with the chat bubbles and find Lady GaGa, Katy Perry, and Rick Rubin staring back at me. Now, I love the GaGa as much as the next girl, but what about my actual friends? Where are they?

Apple promised a Facebook Connect feature allowing me to easily search for my Facebook friends. Not so much… If you haven’t seen the most recent press, Apple played a bit aggressively with Facebook and was denied access to the API. On Kara Swisher’s blog, All Things D, she spoke to Steve Jobs moments after the Apple announcements and was told by Jobs that Facebook wanted “onerous terms that we could not agree to.” In essence, when Facebook’s API is called upon with over 100 million requests a day, Facebook requires a monetary agreement to handle the overload on their systems. Apple and Facebook could not come to an agreement on this and hence no Facebook for Ping.

Until this is resolved, I can only find my friends by entering in their email address one by one until I find someone. Suffice to say, this is the real “onerous” process and simply unmanageable by anyone who has a job. Yesterday, my friend from Berlin tracked me down so I officially have one real Ping friend. This is only one hiccup with the service but the most sizeable one. Until this one issue is resolved, Ping will have problems truly being a “social network for music” without connecting its 160MM worldwide users together.

3) What Type of Music Defines Me?
2010-09-04-Ping7.png

On the initial fire of the Ping community, you’re asked to pick a collection of music which will be used on your profile to define you to your friends. I don’t take this process lightly at all. Being someone who previously worked in the music industry, I take my collection and particular music taste very seriously. The user has the choice between a manual selection of music or an automatically pre-selected one chosen by an Apple algorithm. Being that this was an Apple interface, my expectation was that Apple would choose my taste better than I could possibly define my own. Yup, not the case.

Instead of looking at my music library, which would be the obvious choice, Ping seems to favor my purchased iTunes items, surfacing selections which may not be something I’d like to define my musical taste by. Selfish selection by Apple really. Imagine you buy Justin Bieber for your 12-year-old niece and all of a sudden it surfaces as your favorite music. Bieber fail. Manual entry is certainly a requirement.

**Please note: This would never happen on this MacBook of course. I wouldn’t allow this sort of download on my machine. Just sayin…

4) Sharing Begins & Ends in iTunes
2010-09-04-Ping8.png

Hey Apple, just want to let you know about these fantastic social networks known as Facebook and Twitter. You may have heard about them? Only about 500 MM users use the first one. Just thought I’d let you know, as you seem to care not for the likes of those little guys. You may have 160 MM worldwide users but before you get on that soapbox, Mark Zuckerberg and his Facebook dominion holds down 500 MM globally. When I go to “like” something in Ping, I share that like with the Ping community alone. There are currently no sharing features with Facebook, Twitter or MySpace and with that list being the three primary social networks, seems Ping is lacking a little in the “social” department. Apple seems to be acting like a possessive boyfriend with this product rather than truly building a social experience for music.

5) News Feed Overload
2010-09-04-Ping9.png

After seeing a recommendation from Alexandra Petsavas, my favorite music supervisor who brilliantly filled an entire episode of The O.C. with Beck B sides, I decided to download a few tracks from the Canadian band, The Acorn. Now, my entire feed is filled with my love for The Acorn even though I downloaded a few tracks off of one album. I wish there could be more control in terms of what is surfaced and what isn’t. I don’t need every song purchase listed in my feed especially around the holidays when I decide that The Time Life Christmas CD’s are a must-have.

So is Ping the MySpace Killer? If you enjoy sitting in enclosed spaces talking to yourself about your favorite music, then yes, Ping wins.

Alright, I’m off. MySpace just threw me an “Are You Still Listening?” curve ball and I need to change this song.

We’re sorry, the number you have reached is not in service at this time. Please check the number or try your call again. Telephone Lady GaGa

Read more: Steve Jobs, Alexandra Petsavas, Rick Rubin, Pandora, Myspace, Lady GaGa, Twitter, Technology, Facebook, Ping, Katy Perry, Smartphone, Apple, Mark Zuckerberg, Iphone, Lastfm, Micki Krimmel, The Acorn, Itunes, Technology News

Angelina Jolie Condemns Planned Quran Burning

ISLAMABAD — Angelina Jolie on Wednesday condemned a Florida church’s threat to burn copies of the Muslim holy book to mark the ninth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.

The 35-year-old actress spoke out against the proposed burning during a trip to Pakistan to raise awareness about the floods that have devastated the largely Muslim country over the last six weeks. She visited in her capacity as a goodwill ambassador for the U.N.’s refugee agency.

Read more: Angelina Jolie, Quran Burning, Angelina Jolie Quran, Entertainment News

Dan Persons: Cinefantastique Podcast: 2010 Summer Wrap-Up of Sci-Fi, Horror, & Fantasy Film

It’s a special Labor Day edition of the Cinefantastique Podcast. Eschewing the usual round-up of news and reviews, Dan Persons, Lawrence French, and Steve Biodrowski provide their assessment on the best and worst that this summer had to offer. What tops the list: Splice, Inception, Predators, or Iron Man 2? And what lies at the bottom of the barrel: Jonah Hex, Piranha 3D, The Last Airbender, or Furry Vengeance? Also explored are such riveting questions as: What film is most likely to forget its own title? Which actor took on the most challenging script? What was the worst pro-ecology movie? Was this the season of the ultimate 3D burn-out? And the perennial: Is it possible for one film season to blow and suck at the same time?

<script
src=”http://www.startalkfm.com/include/audio_player.php?audio_file=http://media.blubrry.com/mightymoviepodcast/media.blubrry.com/cinefantastique/cinefantastiqueonline.com/podcast/podcast_v01n30_Summer_Wrap-Up_v01.mp3″ type=”text/javascript”>

2010-09-06-splicepredatorsinceptioncopy_400.jpg

Check out previous episodes of the CFQ Podcast

v1n29 – The Last Exorcism
v1n28 – Piranha 3D
v1n27 – Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

For the latest news on horror, fantasy, and science fiction film and television, visit Cinefantastique online.

Read more: Violence, Action-Adventure, Al Gore, Murder, Horror, Emotion, Sex, Drama, Suspense, An Inconvenient Truth, Controversy, Death, Indie, Success, Comedy, Social Drama, Gore, Science Fiction, Satire, Off Beat, Fantasy, Explosions, Gritty, Art, Animation, Love, Entertainment News

Diane Dimond: The Media Lies To You – Beware!

I took some time off my regular schedule to write a book. It’s all about how we as a society have abrogated our opinion-making and handed it over to whatever media we follow.

For some people these days it takes too much time and effort to engage in critical thinking. But what if the media is just playing follow the leader – parroting each other and not really checking out the facts? It happens all the time and now more than ever we need to use our common sense to help lead us to the truth.

My new book is about the couple the media branded “The White House Gate Crashers,” Michaele and Tareq Salahi. The name of it is “Cirque du Salahi – Be Careful Who You Trust” and I don’t mention it here as just a shameless plug for my own work. I mention is because Cirque – or circus – perfectly describes the information superhighway traveling into our homes every minute of every day. It has become a circus of truths, half-truthful exaggerations and downright lies. Many of us gobble it up without stopping to think what we’re digesting.

Let’s analyze the nickname the press gave the Salahis just hours after they appeared at President Obama’s first state dinner on November 24, 2009: “The White House Gate Crashers.” But, whoa! Stop and think about that a minute.

Nobody “crashes” the gate at the White House, for goodness sakes! The place is ringed with armed guards and a massive security net. So why would the media say that – over and over before any real facts were known? Because it’s catchy and it fits into today’s terrorist watch mentality. Salahi – why it even sounds like a suspect Middle Eastern name!

The Salahis decided to open up to one person – me – and to tell their whole story. During my investigation I got to dissect all their e-mails with a White House representative who promised to try to get them in to the event. I discovered the Salahis honestly believed they were invited to the welcoming ceremony for the Prime Minister of India. I learned that once they arrived at the White House they presented their passports to not one – but two – Secret Service checkpoints and they were waved right in. Once inside the grand reception hall staff ushered them through the official receiving line and then into the lavish dinner tent set up on the South Lawn.

Now, what part of that sounds like a “gate crashing” to you? That’s right – none of it. Yet to this day most media continue to refer to the Salahis as “crashers” and remind the public that federal charges are still a possibility. Ridiculous.

The Salahis immediately cooperated with federal investigators who learned the details I’ve just outlined for you – and much more. Yet those investigators apparently didn’t pass the word on to the Congressional Homeland Security Committee. Even before the hearing members publicly vilified the Salahis. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee called them, “the perpetrators.” Her colleague, Eleanor Holmes Norton declared, “Clearly they were outlaws before they crashed the White House.” So when the couple was subpoenaed to appear before the committee there is there any wonder why they exercised their constitutional right to remain silent? With the deck already stacked against them they had no choice but to take their lawyer’s advice and plead the fifth. Your lawyer would tell you to do the same.

It was a shameful kangaroo court proceeding conducted by the Congressional panel that’s supposed to be concentrating on ways to keep the country safe in this post 9-11 atmosphere. Instead, the politicians were more interested in getting face time on TV while the story was still hot.

The Salahis are not like you and me. Months before the White House event they were cast as members on a “reality” TV show. An odd move, in my book, but being odd is not against the law in America. They owe money to multiple creditors but how many other citizens have gotten caught up in this bad economy? Their worst luck was to become the target in this new era of lock-and-load journalism. The media decides who the focus is and relentlessly zero in.

The Salahis biggest transgression may have been that they blindly trusted too many people. Their own entertainment lawyer paved the way to the White House state dinner then dropped them like a bag of toxic waste after the scandal broke. They trusted federal investigators would help clear their name. They trusted that the justice system and the federal grand jury hearing their evidence would exonerate them. They trusted that the media would ultimately get the story straight. But here we are almost a year later and the Salahis are still twisting in the wind.

Too many of today’s professional journalists, augmented by mostly inexperienced internet bloggers, are all too eager to jump on the story-du-jour for fear of being left behind. Too bad they don’t take the time to research facts before parroting what others have reported before them.

Be careful who you trust.

Diane can be reached through her web site www.DianeDimond.com Her new book can be pre-ordered at Amazon.com.

Read more: Reality TV, Obama's State Dinner, Diane Dimond, Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, The Media Lies to You, Tareq and Michaele Salahi, Diane Dimond's Weekly Column, Congresswoman Sheeila Jackson Lee, Cirque Du Salahi Be Careful Who You Trust, Congressional Homeland Security Committee, Politics News

John W. Whitehead: Lady Gaga and the Pornification of America

“This mornig my little 8 year old sister…scremed to the tope of her lungs ‘! I LOVE LADY GAGA TILL DEATH!’ over and over agin HISTERICLY and crying because she saw a lady gaga video…now she cant talk HEY BUT I LOVE HER TWO HAHAHA.”– Lady Gaga Facebook fan

With a record-breaking 17 million fans on Facebook, an equally chart-topping 5 million followers on Twitter, the most popular hashtext on twitter (#becauseofgaga), the most watched YouTube video (“Bad Romance,” with over 271 million views), and more than $34 million in ticket sales from her Monster Ball Tour, Lady Gaga, a.k.a. the artist formerly known as Stefani Germanotta, is undeniably a musical force to be reckoned with. At least for the moment.

Nominated for 13 MTV Music Video Awards, including four for “Bad Romance” (which attracted so much attention when it premiered that it ground Gaga’s website to a halt), Gaga knows how to fill seats, sell albums and incite a frenzied devotion among her followers, whom she affectionately refers to as “Little Monsters.” The emphasis is on the “little.” With a fan base dominated by the under-20 set (her fans on Facebook range in age from 10-21), the driving force behind Gaga’s popularity and success comes from “kidpower.” Yet the content of Gaga’s music and videos is far from kid-friendly, and the impact on her young female fans is particularly troublesome.

Indeed, Gaga admits that “the last thing a young woman needs is another picture of a sexy pop star writhing in sand, covered in grease, touching herself.” However, if you were to replace “sand” with “brothel floor” and “grease” with “diamonds,” Gaga is precisely “another sexy pop star,” albeit one whose hyper-sexualized façade has greatly contributed to the pornification of American culture. As theatre historian and University of Illinois professor Mardia Bishop explains, “pop culture and porn culture have become part of the same seamless continuum. As these images become pervasive in popular culture, they become normalized… and… accepted.”

Given the youth of Gaga’s fanbase, however, this foray into porn culture — the increasing acceptability and pervasiveness of sexualized imagery in mainstream media — is where the Gaga phenomenon takes a dark turn. “Visual images and narratives of music videos clearly have more potential to form attitudes, values, or perceptions of social reality than does the music alone,” notes author Douglas A. Gentile in his book Media Violence and Children, “because they add additional information and rely less on imagination.” For example, Gaga’s critically acclaimed “Bad Romance” video packs a lot of messages — none of them wholesome — into a five-minute musical in which the singer is kidnapped, drugged, and forced to sell herself as a prostitute to the highest bidder. The video ends with a scantily clad Gaga lying on a bed in a post-coital pose beside the smoldering skeleton of her “customer” while her pyrotechnic bra emits fire.

That said, Gaga is far from the only mainstream artist contributing to the sexualization and pornification of young children through the mediums of pop music and music videos. Among the worst culprits constantly bombarding young people today with sexual images and references are music videos, which are found daily in 75-80% of the homes of 9- to 14-year-olds. Children between the ages of 8 and 18 spend approximately 30-120 minutes a day watching music videos — 75% of which contain sexually suggestive materials, and with the advent of portable technology, children’s television and music are often unmonitored by parents or guardians. Not only does this accelerate adolescent sexual behavior (girls between the ages of 12-14 are two times more likely to engage in sexual activity after being exposed to sexual imagery), but it increases the likelihood of more sexual partners.

As for Gaga’s “little monsters,” between the celebrity worship and the hyper-sexed imagery found in the pop star’s videos, they’re getting double-teamed. Indeed, Nancy Bauer, a Tufts University professor, argues that as “adoration of celebrities as idols or role models is a normal part of identity development in childhood and adolescence,” young girls often look to celebrities as moral exemplars. This adoration can manifest itself from something as simple as putting up posters of the celebrity to more destructive behaviors, such as starving oneself to mimic a celebrity’s body shape.

Thus, to younger children, Lady Gaga crawling around on the floor in diamonds and giving a lap dance to an emotionally distant male stranger becomes the embodiment of Gaga behavior — to be studied and emulated. For example, the image of Gaga with overly large, computer-generated eyes in “Bad Romance” has given rise to a whole new craze in eyewear — circle lenses. After the video premiered, a professional make-up artist and spokesperson for Lancome, Michelle Phan, uploaded a “How To” video teaching girls how to achieve a similar look. The instruction video, which calls for five layers of false lashes, two eyeliners, brow gel, three different eye shadows, a brow pencil, circle contact lenses, and an anti-inflammatory “not meant for daily use,” received over 12 million hits. One user commented “!? Nice ^^ I want to do this look but I’am just 11 years old!!!” Another girl, 16 years old, admitted to owning 22 pairs of the dangerous (and expensive) lenses. The American Optometric Association, however, has cautioned that the lenses used, which increase the apparent size of the eye by covering not only the iris but also part of the whites of the eyes, pose serious health risks, including “the potential for irreversible sight loss.” If Gaga intended her large eyes to represent innocence lost — a fair and, admittedly, clever, symbol — that’s not what 12 million young viewers got out of it.

That Gaga’s fan base is significantly younger and therefore less capable of comprehending the difference between reality and fantasy and more likely to interpret imagery on a literal level than the fans of past artists demonstrates why Gaga is such a central factor in the pornification of American youth through popular music. Anything they see, whether it’s Gaga caged up with vertebrate sticking out of her back or Gaga using her sexuality to seduce and then murder a male counterpart as she does in “Bad Romance,” is accepted as fact. Her outrageous fashion choices and excessive make-up keep up this façade. As Gaga herself admits, “I don’t even drink water onstage in front of anybody, because I want them to focus on the fantasy of the music.”

But as professor Bauer notes, “the difference [between Gaga and other celebrities] is, somehow, that these people feel individually like [Gaga’s] a real role model — that they could be her.” It is precisely this reciprocal relationship, something that usually manifests itself only in individuals with borderline-pathological celebrity worship syndrome that explains the difference between Gaga’s fans and others. Fans that are not otherwise borderline-pathological hold similar mindsets, including the fantasy that Gaga loves them on a personal level, shares in their successes and failures, and is not only a role model but also a projection of the self.

Gaga reinforces this perception through her own carefully choreographed behavior, appearing to show genuine love and an almost motherly concern for her fans. As she explains to one interviewer, “What I’m really trying to say is I want the deepest, darkest, sickest parts of you that you are afraid to share with anyone because I love you that much.” Gaga also manages to create a sense of intimacy and reciprocity in what is traditionally a non-reciprocal relationship, constantly attributing her success and happiness to her fans. For example, Gaga tattooed “Little Monsters” on her forearm, tweeting, “Look what I did last night. Little monsters forever, on the arm that holds my mic.” In response, one fan gushed, “If I ever meet YOU, I’m going to get your signature tattooed on me too!!” Another states, “I wish we could sit down together and talk about all this stuff together. You would love the stories I have! And I know you’d believe me.”

This pseudo-reciprocal relationship, then, is foundational to Gaga’s pervasive impact on fans. After all, when fans are imbued with a sense of importance, they become ravenous consumers of associated commercial products. Yet, in an ironic take on “Bad Romance,” in the end, it’s Gaga’s young fans who are being used for their consumer appetites and sold to the highest bidder.

And what merchandise those appetites have spawned. Gaga’s once obscure fashion has come to inspire Prada, Armani, and Alexander Wang. Nude corsets, lace, bodysuits, feathers, and “the pantsless look” have all been featured on the runways. Particular materials — corsets, high-heels, leather, rubber, fur, and underwear as outerwear are all commonly used in the porn industry, and all appear in Gaga’s “Bad Romance.” These fashions, like fashions of the past, trickle down to reach young girls — which explains how sexually provocative slogans like “Feeling Lucky” find themselves stamped on the backs of underwear marketed to 7 year olds.

Clearly, there are trade-offs in every relationship, and Lady Gaga is no exception. However, while Gaga gets stardom, wealth and affirmation out of her young fan base, it is not without a certain amount of trepidation that one wonders what her “little monsters” are getting in return.

Read more: Pornography, Lady GaGa, Lady Gaga Bad Romance, Entertainment News

Angelina Jolie Meets Flood Victims In Pakistan

JALOZAI, Pakistan — American movie star Angelina Jolie met flood victims in northwestern Pakistan on Tuesday and appealed to the international community to provide aid needed to help the country recover from its worst natural disaster.

The flow of aid money has stalled in recent days, and officials expressed hope the two-day visit by Jolie – who serves as a “goodwill ambassador” for the U.N.’s refugee agency – will convince foreign countries and individuals to open their wallets.

Read more: Angelina Jolie, Angelina Jolie Pakistan, Pakistan, Entertainment News